• Phone: 1-343-700-3427
CANAAN BRIDGES CONSULTING INC.

CANAAN BRIDGES CONSULTING INC.

We Help You: Grow. Achieve. Accelerate.
  • GROW. ACHIEVE. ACCELERATE.
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Brand Optimization Strategies
    • Feasibility Studies
    • Intellectual Property Strategies
    • Geographical Indications Strategies
    • Project Strategies
    • Intellectual Property Audits
    • Event Planning
    • Research
    • Intellectual Property Training
      • Music Copyright Course
      • Intellectual Property Essentials for the Fashion Designer
      • Food-based Geographical Indications for Farmers and Producers – Course
      • Developing Product Specifications for Geographical Indications – Course
    • Nation-Branding
    • Recruiting
    • More Things We Do
  • Short Articles
  • Online Courses
  • Online Course Registration
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

What a US-China Trade Deal Means for trends in Global IP Rights

international Trade and IP

Marsha Cadogan, PhD (Intellectual Property Rights)

Talks of a US-China trade deal have once again re-surfaced. Intellectual property (IP) issues between the two countries are certain to be one of the focus points of these discussions. There is a close relationship between trade deals and IP. Global IP rules were established by an agreement under the World Trade Organization (WTO) system called the Agreement on the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual property rights (TRIPS). This agreement established IP rules which each member of the WTO has to comply with when doing trade-related business with each other, and within their own jurisdictions. Theoretically, this is how the framework works.

By these rules, each WTO member country implemented minimum standards of protection for IP as a way of internationally harmonizing set rules on IP laws. The operative word here is minimum. Over the past decade or so, there is an observable upward movement in the levels of IP rights in many jurisdictions, made possible through regime-shifting to non-multilateral trading platforms. What does this mean? Rather than implementing minimum standards of IP protection, many jurisdictions have instead implemented high (robust) standards of IP protection, a trend made possible through preferential free trade agreements. For example in terms of copyright protection, a few countries have increased the period of protection for sound recordings from 50 to 95 years, a move heavily driven by interest in securing favorable trade and investment terms for the host countries economy in foreign jurisdictions. There is also a perception that a jurisdiction with strong IP rights will attract greater foreign investors, since investors will have a sense of security, knowing that their rights will not be easily infringed, or if it is infringed, there are effective remedies in place. The preferential free agreements can be between two countries, a regional bloc, or countries from different places in the world. Concerning IP protection, one of the appealing features of preferential free trade agreements is they allow parties to carve out specific (or even sometimes controversial) positions on IP, which is favorable to their jurisdiction and domestic industries, even though it may not be favourable to the other party. This works when there are power imbalances between parties to the agreement.

Therefore, although a multi-lateral system established global IP rules, today, much of IP is shaped by IP provisions in preferential free trade agreements. These include CETA, CUSMA, EU-based agreements, African regional free trade agreements, Caribbean Basin Initiative to name a few. What this means is that the types of laws that govern how IP works in a particular jurisdiction is often based on what that country has agreed to in specific preferential free trade agreements.

How may this play out in a US-China trade deal?

In terms of IP protection: China is listed on the US Special 301 Report for unfair IP practices, and has been- for many years (including this year). This is a list produced annually on the global state of intellectual property protection and enforcement. China is placed on a priority watch list for unfair practices in:

Trade secrets violations, inadequate copyright penalties and enforcement procedures, and inadequate criminal, administrative and civil remedies for IP protection among many more.

It is very likely that the IP provisions of a US-China trade deal will have “fixes” to these shortfalls through specific provisions on trade secrets, copyright protection and enforcement, geographical indications, trademarks and digital trade (and more). Following from the recently concluded United States, Mexico, Canada agreement (USMCA) which included a progressive IP chapter, a similar trajectory in IP outlook is likely to be followed by the United States.

At least three provisions in USMCA were pioneering, though some scholars will argue that they did not go far enough in protecting IP rights: trade secrets, digital trade and provision on the protection of country names against un-authorised use. The inclusion of similar provisions in a US-China trade deal is very likely and impacts the global IP regime in two ways (whether these IP changes are strongly reflected in China’s IP rules is not the focus of the current discussion) – :

(a) influences other countries to implement similar IP rules in their jurisdictions, either through trade agreements with the U.S, via trade, investment or IP agreements with other countries that do business with the U.S or China, or through domestic lobbying influences and,

(b) fosters domestic discussions on many aspects of IP rules (since almost all WTO countries trade with China and IP is important to each jurisdiction). This may help to influence changes in global IP (trade secrets, digital trade and the protection of country names against un-authorised commercial use) norms , especially if multilateral trade and IP bodies support these perspectives.

November 1, 2019

Previous
Next

Recent Posts

  • The Global Fashion Industry and Intellectual Property Protection: Reconciling the Bitter-Sweet Relationship
  • Does intellectual property have a role in start up ventures?
  • GIs in Canada – Webinar
  • IP, The Circular & Green Economy: Benefits
  • Press Release
  • Technology Licensing in the Oil & Gas Industry: Considerations for Guyana
  • Intellectual property, Trade and Technology Podcast: Trailer
  • Intellectual Property Rights and the Construction Industry: Linkages
  • Differences between Trademarks and Geographical Indications
  • Intellectual property cases in 2019 and implications for the future of IP around the world
  • Promoting Innovation in High Technology Start Ups – Licensing Executives Society, Webinar moderated by Marsha S. Cadogan
  • The International Treaty on Geographical Indications: Implications
  • Why Intellectual Property Valuations Are Important
  • Three Intellectual Property-based Tips on how to Sustainably Innovate For a Green Future
  • Starting a Business in COVID-19 Times: IP and Trade Considerations
  • How Preferential Free Trade Agreements Influence Trademark Rights
  • So What Really is Innovation?
  • 2020 IP Pins# 5: Building Sustainable Relationships Between Agriculture and Intellectual Property

Archives

  • GROW. ACHIEVE. ACCELERATE.
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Brand Optimization Strategies
    • Feasibility Studies
    • Intellectual Property Strategies
    • Geographical Indications Strategies
    • Project Strategies
    • Intellectual Property Audits
    • Event Planning
    • Research
    • Intellectual Property Training
      • Music Copyright Course
      • Intellectual Property Essentials for the Fashion Designer
      • Food-based Geographical Indications for Farmers and Producers – Course
      • Developing Product Specifications for Geographical Indications – Course
    • Nation-Branding
    • Recruiting
    • More Things We Do
  • Short Articles
  • Online Courses
  • Online Course Registration
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Search

Browse by pages

  • About Us
  • Brand Optimization Strategies
  • Contact Us
  • Developing Product Specifications for Geographical Indications – Course
  • Event Planning
  • Food-based Geographical Indications for Farmers and Producers – Course
  • GROW. ACHIEVE. ACCELERATE.
  • Intellectual Property Audits
  • Intellectual Property Essentials for the Fashion Designer
  • Intellectual Property Strategies
  • Intellectual Property, International Trade and Technology Podcast
  • Music Copyright Course
  • Online Course Registration
  • Online Courses
  • Pricing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Project Strategies
  • Recruiting
  • Registration Page
  • Research
  • Services
    • Feasibility Studies
    • Geographical Indications Strategies
    • Intellectual Property Training
    • More Things We Do
    • Nation-Branding
  • Short Articles

Canaan Bridges Consulting. All Rights Reserved 2019.

Theme : Consulting Company WordPress Theme